Latest News On HFCS False Advertising Case Will Leave You Laughing

 Corn Refiners Association (CRA), ADM and Cargill File Countersuit Against Sugar Association

Feel Like Laughing?  The Corn Refiners Association Counterclaim Against the Sugar Farmers Will Do the Trick

I have been keeping you up to date in the high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) false advertising case and the latest news will leave you laughing.

After failing to gain approval from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to change the name for HFCS to “corn sugar” and then failing to stop a major national lawsuit against them, corn refiners Cargill, Archer-Daniels-Midland (ADM), Tate & Lyle Ingredient Americas and Ingredion have filed a counterclaim against the Sugar Association.  The counterclaim hilariously argues that the trade group – one of the plaintiffs in the original suit – has harmed them by publishing statements on its website that HFCS is meaningfully different from natural sugar.

What a joke.  Are you laughing as hard as I am?  Science has shown us that HFCS is different from natural sugar.  Plus, I am left wondering how the corn refiners have been harmed?  Since 1970,  U.S. per capita consumption of sugar has dropped by almost 40 percent while per capita consumption of HFCS has increased by more than 1,000 percent. The fact that American consumption of high-fructose corn syrup fell to a 20-year low in 2011 is not a function of this lawsuit, but one of consumers doing their homework on the facts surrounding HFCS.

Group Actually Harmed by Corn Refiners False Advertising Started Original Lawsuit

The original lawsuit, Western Sugar Cooperative v. Archer-Daniels-Midland, Co., was filed in April 2011 by a group of sugar farmers to stop a multi-million dollar marketing campaign attempting to lead consumers to believe that HFCS and sugar are in fact, the same.

The sugar farmers claimed that the HFCS advertising was false and misleading because it: (1) described HFCS as “natural” although advanced technology is required to transform corn starch at the molecular level; (2) called HFCS “corn sugar” although the FDA reserved that term for an entirely different sweetener; and (3) claimed that “your body can’t tell the difference” between HFCS and sugar, although numerousscientists have reached the opposite conclusion - despite the ads from the corn refiners targeted to confuse consumers and increase sales.

So Far Law and Science Land On The Side of Consumers

Even the federal judge presiding over the lawsuit late last year ruled that the sugar farmers had presented enough evidence demonstrating “a reasonable probability of success on their argument that the statements are false.”  In July, the federal court also rejected an effort by the corn refiners to have the case against them dismissed.

“The defendants are pulling out every stop, first trying to avoid answering the lawsuit and now apparently trying to muddy the issues with their counterclaim,” said Adam Fox of Squire Sanders, co-lead counsel for the Sugar Association and other plaintiffs in the case.  “I am confident that this most recent tactical ploy by ADM, Cargill and the others won’t fool anyone.   The evidence plainly shows that sugar and HFCS are not the same.  They are molecularly different.  They are functionally different. The body can tell the difference.”

This conclusion was lent scientific support by a recent study by researchers at the Universities of Florida and Colorado published online in Metabolism,  which showed that compared with sucrose (otherwise known as  table sugar), HFCS leads to greater fructose systemic exposure and significantly different acute metabolic effects. 

In May, the FDA rejected a petition by the Corn Refiners Association (CRA) – the trade association of ADM, Cargill, Ingredion and Tate & Lyle Ingredient Americas – to change the well known, and increasingly unpopular name for HFCS to “corn sugar.”  The FDA explained that “the use of the term ‘sugar’ to describe HFCS, a product that is a syrup, would not accurately identify or describe the basic nature of the food or its characterizing properties.”

Oh and the FDA forgot to say that is false advertising...but that will be resolved soon enough.

More on this story as it comes available.

P.S.- People always ask me where I get my organic food and personal care products and I love to tell them about The Green PolkaDot Box! Backed by the Organic Consumer's Association and, you can easily buy NonGMO organic groceries, including Harvest Fresh Organic produce, at wholesale pricing online.  It's like a Sam's club but focused on products for green, healthy living! You can even shop by dietary restrictions like gluten free, vegan or diabetic and it all comes right to your front door. Enjoy!

No comments:

Post a Comment

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has." - Margaret Mead